First self-driving car fatality

Lies, damned lies, and statistics.
User avatar
Anaxagoras
Posts: 20363
Joined: Wed Mar 19, 2008 5:45 am
Location: Yokohama/Tokyo, Japan
Has thanked: 1256 times
Been thanked: 1034 times

Re: First self-driving car fatality

Postby Anaxagoras » Wed Mar 28, 2018 11:52 am

I totally agree that the driver was derelict and should be fired, but that's just the tip of the iceberg. If people have a false sense of security because they think the technology is safer than it really is, they'll start to slack off on the job.
A fool thinks himself to be wise, but a wise man knows himself to be a fool.
William Shakespeare

User avatar
gnome
Posts: 21513
Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2004 12:40 am
Location: New Port Richey, FL
Has thanked: 315 times
Been thanked: 322 times

Re: First self-driving car fatality

Postby gnome » Wed Mar 28, 2018 12:12 pm

It could be that until there's another major step forward in sensing and reacting, that we're still better off with human controlled vehicles that occasionally have a computer override to react to something the human driver missed. Of course, finding that out is half the point of these limited road tests I suppose.
"If fighting is sure to result in victory, then you must fight! Sun Tzu said that, and I'd say he knows a little bit more about fighting than you do, pal, because he invented it, and then he perfected it so that no living man could best him in the ring of honor. Then, he used his fight money to buy two of every animal on earth, and then he herded them onto a boat, and then he beat the crap out of every single one. And from that day forward any time a bunch of animals are together in one place it's called a zoo! (Beat) Unless it's a farm!"
--Soldier, TF2

User avatar
Anaxagoras
Posts: 20363
Joined: Wed Mar 19, 2008 5:45 am
Location: Yokohama/Tokyo, Japan
Has thanked: 1256 times
Been thanked: 1034 times

Re: First self-driving car fatality

Postby Anaxagoras » Wed May 09, 2018 4:49 am

Uber’s self-driving car saw the pedestrian but didn’t swerve – report
Tuning of car’s software to avoid false positives blamed, as US National Transportation Safety Board investigation continues

An Uber self-driving test car which killed a woman crossing the street detected her but decided not to react immediately, a report has said.

The car was travelling at 40mph (64km/h) in self-driving mode when it collided with 49-year-old Elaine Herzberg at about 10pm on 18 March. Herzberg was pushing a bicycle across the road outside of a crossing. She later died from her injuries.

Although the car’s sensors detected Herzberg, its software which decides how it should react was tuned too far in favour of ignoring objects in its path which might be “false positives” (such as plastic bags), according to a report from the Information. This meant the modified Volvo XC90 did not react fast enough.

The report also said the human safety driver was not paying close enough attention to intervene before the vehicle struck the pedestrian.

Arizona suspended Uber’s self-driving vehicle testing after the incident. The company later settled with Herzberg’s family.

Uber and the US National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) are investigating the incident. Uber has already reached its preliminary conclusion, according to the report. A comprehensive NTSB report is expected later.


I have wondered about the plastic bag problem. How do you make sure it stops when it needs to but not for something like a plastic bag blowing across the highway? Or a tumbleweed. It's a problem though if the sensors can't distinguish between the two.
A fool thinks himself to be wise, but a wise man knows himself to be a fool.
William Shakespeare

User avatar
Grammatron
Posts: 32374
Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2004 1:21 am
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Been thanked: 1443 times

Re: First self-driving car fatality

Postby Grammatron » Wed May 09, 2018 7:57 am

What The Guardian oddly omits is that this report and its findings are from Uber itself, not exactly an unbiased party.
pillory wrote:jokes aren't funny....seriously thinking......

seriously thinking might be funny....but it's not joke

User avatar
Anaxagoras
Posts: 20363
Joined: Wed Mar 19, 2008 5:45 am
Location: Yokohama/Tokyo, Japan
Has thanked: 1256 times
Been thanked: 1034 times

Re: First self-driving car fatality

Postby Anaxagoras » Wed May 09, 2018 9:04 am

Grammatron wrote:What The Guardian oddly omits is that this report and its findings are from Uber itself, not exactly an unbiased party.


Uber and the NTSB if I'm not mistaken.
A fool thinks himself to be wise, but a wise man knows himself to be a fool.
William Shakespeare


Return to “Politics & Social Issues”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: CCBot [Bot] and 3 guests