## Supreme Court strikes a blow for the First Amendment.

Lies, damned lies, and statistics.
Skeeve
Posts: 10320
Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2004 7:35 am
Has thanked: 46 times
Been thanked: 77 times

### Left and right united in opposition to ... SCOTUS decision

UPDATE: Left and right united in opposition to controversial SCOTUS decision
Much has been made of late about the hyper-partisan political environment in America. On Tuesday, Sen. Evan Bayh explained his surprising recent decision to leave the Senate by lamenting a "dysfunctional" political system riddled with "brain-dead partisanship." It seems you'd be hard-pressed to get Republicans and Democrats inside and outside of Washington to agree on anything these days, that if one party publicly stated its intention to add a "puppies are adorable" declaration to its platform, that the other party would immediately launch a series of anti-puppy advertisements.

But it appears that one issue does unite Americans across the political spectrum.

A new Washington Post-ABC News poll finds that the vast majority of Americans are vehemently opposed to a recent Supreme Court ruling that opens the door for corporations, labor unions, and other organizations to spend money directly from their general funds to influence campaigns.
Interesting....oh well.
I doubt many folks here 'on the Right' are bleating about it too much.
However, for all the other folks 'on the 'Right' who voted for dubya, just remember, he appointed two of the Justices that voted for it.
Then Skank Of America could start in...

corplinx
Posts: 20024
Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2008 12:49 am
Title: Moderator
Has thanked: 210 times
Been thanked: 657 times

### Re: Left and right united in opposition to ... SCOTUS decisi

It could just as easily read "left and right united in support". See the fallacy there and bias there?

There isn't a single group of people who support or oppose the decision in a uniform groupthink.

DrMatt
BANNED
Posts: 29811
Joined: Fri Jul 16, 2004 4:00 pm
Location: Location: Location!
Has thanked: 143 times
Been thanked: 70 times
Where do foreigners and prisoners fall in this story?
Grayman wrote:If masturbation led to homosexuality you'd think by now I'd at least have better fashion sense.

corplinx
Posts: 20024
Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2008 12:49 am
Title: Moderator
Has thanked: 210 times
Been thanked: 657 times
DrMatt wrote:Where do foreigners and prisoners fall in this story?
Sarlacc Pit

WildCat
Posts: 13851
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2004 2:53 am
Location: The 33rd Ward, Chicago
Has thanked: 32 times
Been thanked: 332 times

### Re: Left and right united in opposition to ... SCOTUS decisi

Skeeve wrote:UPDATE:
No, it wasn't really an update.

Do you have questions about God?

you sniveling little right-wing nutter - jj

Skeeve
Posts: 10320
Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2004 7:35 am
Has thanked: 46 times
Been thanked: 77 times

### Re: Left and right united in opposition to ... SCOTUS decisi

corplinx wrote:
It could just as easily read "left and right united in support". See the fallacy there and bias there?
...
As noted by the Post's Dan Eggen, the poll's findings show "remarkably strong agreement" across the board, with roughly 80% of Americans saying that they're against the Court's 5-4 decision. Even more remarkable may be that opposition by Republicans, Democrats, and Independents were all near the same 80% opposition range. Specifically, 85% of Democrats, 81% of Independents, and 76% of Republicans opposed it. In short, "everyone hates" the ruling.
It looks pretty one-sided corplinx.
corplinx wrote:There isn't a single group of people who support or oppose the decision in a uniform groupthink.
I'm not sure what you mean, but I am willing to listen.
WildCat wrote:No, it wasn't really an update.

I have, I guess I missed this one, and your right it is a bit old, my bad.
Then Skank Of America could start in...

xouper
Posts: 8756
Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2004 4:52 am
Location: HockeyTown USA
Has thanked: 216 times
Been thanked: 134 times

### Re: Left and right united in opposition to ... SCOTUS decisi

... As noted by the Post's Dan Eggen, the poll's findings show "remarkably strong agreement" across the board, with roughly 80% of Americans saying that they're against the Court's 5-4 decision. Even more remarkable may be that opposition by Republicans, Democrats, and Independents were all near the same 80% opposition range. Specifically, 85% of Democrats, 81% of Independents, and 76% of Republicans opposed it. In short, "everyone hates" the ruling.
It's discouraging to see how many politicians are in favor of violating the First Amendment. And that's exactly why it was put there.

DrMatt
BANNED
Posts: 29811
Joined: Fri Jul 16, 2004 4:00 pm
Location: Location: Location!
Has thanked: 143 times
Been thanked: 70 times
Unanimous on "under god", remember?
Grayman wrote:If masturbation led to homosexuality you'd think by now I'd at least have better fashion sense.

Skeeve
Posts: 10320
Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2004 7:35 am
Has thanked: 46 times
Been thanked: 77 times

### Re: Left and right united in opposition to ... SCOTUS decisi

xouper wrote:
... As noted by the Post's Dan Eggen, the poll's findings show "remarkably strong agreement" across the board, with roughly 80% of Americans saying that they're against the Court's 5-4 decision. Even more remarkable may be that opposition by Republicans, Democrats, and Independents were all near the same 80% opposition range. Specifically, 85% of Democrats, 81% of Independents, and 76% of Republicans opposed it. In short, "everyone hates" the ruling.
It's discouraging to see how many politicians are in favor of violating the First Amendment. And that's exactly why it was put there.
Unless you are joking, I think they mean 'just folks' in this poll, not politicians.
Then Skank Of America could start in...

xouper
Posts: 8756
Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2004 4:52 am
Location: HockeyTown USA
Has thanked: 216 times
Been thanked: 134 times

### Re: Left and right united in opposition to ... SCOTUS decisi

Skeeve wrote:
xouper wrote:
... As noted by the Post's Dan Eggen, the poll's findings show "remarkably strong agreement" across the board, with roughly 80% of Americans saying that they're against the Court's 5-4 decision. Even more remarkable may be that opposition by Republicans, Democrats, and Independents were all near the same 80% opposition range. Specifically, 85% of Democrats, 81% of Independents, and 76% of Republicans opposed it. In short, "everyone hates" the ruling.
It's discouraging to see how many politicians are in favor of violating the First Amendment. And that's exactly why it was put there.
Unless you are joking, I think they mean 'just folks' in this poll, not politicians.
I should have quoted this part instead:
The poll's findings could enhance the possibility of getting a broad range of support behind a movement in Congress to pass legislation that would offset the Court's decision.

Skeeve
Posts: 10320
Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2004 7:35 am
Has thanked: 46 times
Been thanked: 77 times

### Re: Left and right united in opposition to ... SCOTUS decisi

xouper wrote:
Skeeve wrote:
xouper wrote:
... As noted by the Post's Dan Eggen, the poll's findings show "remarkably strong agreement" across the board, with roughly 80% of Americans saying that they're against the Court's 5-4 decision. Even more remarkable may be that opposition by Republicans, Democrats, and Independents were all near the same 80% opposition range. Specifically, 85% of Democrats, 81% of Independents, and 76% of Republicans opposed it. In short, "everyone hates" the ruling.
It's discouraging to see how many politicians are in favor of violating the First Amendment. And that's exactly why it was put there.
Unless you are joking, I think they mean 'just folks' in this poll, not politicians.
I should have quoted this part instead:
The poll's findings could enhance the possibility of getting a broad range of support behind a movement in Congress to pass legislation that would offset the Court's decision.
Ah, I see, but since...
...
The decision was almost universally hailed by Republicans in Washington, who saw it as a victory for the free speech provided for under the Constitution, while President Obama and prominent Democrats in Washington almost universally derided it as a dark day for American democracy.
If Democrats bring it up, the Republicans will bliock it and it and it will go no where anyway....or maybe not. We'll see.
Then Skank Of America could start in...

DrMatt
BANNED
Posts: 29811
Joined: Fri Jul 16, 2004 4:00 pm
Location: Location: Location!
Has thanked: 143 times
Been thanked: 70 times
The political will to not have an equivalent of our First Amendment exists in Europe.
Grayman wrote:If masturbation led to homosexuality you'd think by now I'd at least have better fashion sense.

Skeeve
Posts: 10320
Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2004 7:35 am
Has thanked: 46 times
Been thanked: 77 times
DrMatt wrote:The political will to not have an equivalent of our First Amendment exists in Europe.
Maybe, however I doubt the GOP will start anything unless their base (or Rush and/or Glen) starts a shit storm, so that leaves the Dem's.

Since the GOP seems to be naturally opposed to anything the Dems bring up....

Ah, well see...
Then Skank Of America could start in...

Nyarlathotep
Posts: 47574
Joined: Fri Jun 04, 2004 2:50 pm
Has thanked: 773 times
Been thanked: 1426 times

### Re: Left and right united in opposition to ... SCOTUS decisi

corplinx wrote:
There isn't a single group of people who support or oppose the decision in a uniform groupthink.
Yes there is. the group of people who support the idea all support it and the group of people who oppose the idea oppose it.

Remember: the first rule of tautology club is the first rule of tautology club...
Bango Skank Awaits The Crimson King!

Skeeve
Posts: 10320
Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2004 7:35 am
Has thanked: 46 times
Been thanked: 77 times

### One solution?

xouper wrote:
tedly wrote:... Does it necessarily follow, from the corporation's creation as a person, that it is therefore a citizen, and entitled to contribute to political campaigns? I seem to recall a great deal of fuss in US politics about taking money from Korean sources, because, (I'm guessing) they weren't citizens.
1) With respect to the court decision and the First Amendment, it is irrelevant whether a corporation is a legal "person".

2) The court decision was not about contributions to political campaigns, it was about Congress making a law abridging freedom of speech.
My solution:
Limit total 'political-candidate' contributions by any person (real or fictional) or entity to a maximum of (lets say) $10,000 per year, TOTAL. And then leave free speech alone. YMMV Then Skank Of America could start in... Abdul Alhazred Posts: 70813 Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2004 1:33 pm Title: Yes, that one. Location: Chicago Has thanked: 3171 times Been thanked: 1175 times I have a better idea. No limits on contributions, but every contribution must be out in the open. Do you really think "limiting the amount" limits the amount? Any man writes a mission statement spends a night in the box. -- our mission statement plappendale WildCat Posts: 13851 Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2004 2:53 am Location: The 33rd Ward, Chicago Has thanked: 32 times Been thanked: 332 times ### Re: One solution? Skeeve wrote:My solution: Limit total 'political-candidate' contributions by any person (real or fictional) or entity to a maximum of (lets say)$10,000 per year, TOTAL.
And then leave free speech alone. YMMV
Why not $10/year? Do you have questions about God? you sniveling little right-wing nutter - jj WildCat Posts: 13851 Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2004 2:53 am Location: The 33rd Ward, Chicago Has thanked: 32 times Been thanked: 332 times Abdul Alhazred wrote:I have a better idea. No limits on contributions, but every contribution must be out in the open. Do you really think "limiting the amount" limits the amount? Yes, it would. If campaign contributions were limited to$10 per person the maximum amount colllected would be $10 times the population. Toni Preckwinkle got$150,000 from the SEIU for her Cook County board run... you don't think that will influence her when it comes to cutting the fat from the county budget?
Do you have questions about God?

you sniveling little right-wing nutter - jj

Abdul Alhazred
Posts: 70813
Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2004 1:33 pm
Title: Yes, that one.
Location: Chicago
Has thanked: 3171 times
Been thanked: 1175 times
WildCat wrote:Toni Preckwinkle got \$150,000 from the SEIU for her Cook County board run... you don't think that will influence her when it comes to cutting the fat from the county budget?
Better than getting it under the table and no one the wiser?

What change in the law do you think it would take to make Cook County not corrupt? As distinct from enforcing the laws we have now?
Any man writes a mission statement spends a night in the box.
-- our mission statement plappendale

Abdul Alhazred
Posts: 70813
Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2004 1:33 pm
Title: Yes, that one.
Location: Chicago
Has thanked: 3171 times
Been thanked: 1175 times
The longer I live here the more I am convinced that rank-and-file voters in Cook County actually like corruption. I also think this is increasingly true of Democrats generally.
Any man writes a mission statement spends a night in the box.
-- our mission statement plappendale