This is our lounge area. Feel free to come in and get acquainted!
- Posts: 21513
- Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2004 12:40 am
- Location: New Port Richey, FL
- Has thanked: 315 times
- Been thanked: 322 times
This kind of puts a new spin on the "infinite number of monkeys typing" deal...
"If fighting is sure to result in victory, then you must fight! Sun Tzu said that, and I'd say he knows a little bit more about fighting than you do, pal, because he invented it, and then he perfected it so that no living man could best him in the ring of honor. Then, he used his fight money to buy two of every animal on earth, and then he herded them onto a boat, and then he beat the crap out of every single one. And from that day forward any time a bunch of animals are together in one place it's called a zoo! (Beat) Unless it's a farm!"
- Posts: 19613
- Joined: Sun Jul 18, 2004 7:15 pm
- Title: Incipient toppler
- Location: Hiding under ed's bed
- Has thanked: 546 times
- Been thanked: 558 times
A US appeals court on Monday favored humans over animals in a novel copyright lawsuit filed over a series of entertaining selfies taken by a monkey with a toothy grin. US copyright law does not allow lawsuits that seek to give animals the rights to photographs or other original work, the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals ruled. Copyright infringement can only be claimed on behalf of humans, the court said. Per the AP, the unanimous, three-judge panel upheld a lower court ruling that dismissed the lawsuit by the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals against a photographer whose camera was used by a crested macaque to take the photos in 2011. PETA's 2015 suit against David Slater sought financial control of the photographs—including a now-famous selfie of the monkey grinning—for the benefit of the animal named Naruto.
http://www.newser.com/story/258304/monk ... rules.html
Reading farther, PITA must pay attorney fees to Slater. PITA may appeal to the Supremes.
Jeff Kerr, general counsel for PETA, said the group was reviewing the opinion and had not decided yet whether it would appeal. "Naruto should be considered the author and copyright owner, and he shouldn't be treated any differently from any other creator simply because he happens to not be human," Kerr said.
Well then. What would Harambe do?
- Posts: 24859
- Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2004 2:17 am
- Title: Man in Black
- Location: Division 6
- Has thanked: 2562 times
- Been thanked: 2509 times
The flash of light you saw in the sky was not a UFO. Swamp gas from a weather balloon was trapped in a thermal pocket and reflected the light from Venus.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: CCBot [Bot] and 0 guests